A few years back Chris Ward, one of the most humorous and
competent writers around, wrote the lower-level
introductory book STARTING OUT: THE NIMZO-INDIAN.
He presented the opening from Black's point of
view (and he has also done a video advocating
Black's side of the Nimzo). Ward has now has
laid out (suggested?) a detailed system from
the White side in NIMZO-INDIAN KASPAROV VARIATION.
The latter begins with the move 4.Nf3, intending
to play either 4...c5 5.g3 or 4...b6 5.Bg5 (4...0-0
5.Bg5 is a little easier for White to handle,
and 4...d6 5.Qc2 normally ends up looking like
one of the 4.Qc2 lines, but with somewhat more
flexibility for White).
Ward also discusses the interesting 4...b6 5.Qb3 which enjoys
spurts of popularity amongst top grandmasters.
In general, the author is so attached to his
favorite Nimzo-Indian that anything he suggests
for White should be taken seriously. Taking a
quick look at STARTING OUT: THE NIMZO-INDIAN,
I see that there's no serious comparison between
the books because STARTING OUT is too elementary,
e.g., Ward had given 5.Qb3 a5 there and analyzed
only 6.a3 a4! etc., but in his new book he thinks
5...a5 is possibly “detrimental” giving
only 6.Bg5 and 6.g3 (and not 6.a3).
I briefly considered comparing Ward's 4.Nf3 repertoire with JOHN
EMM'S NIMZO-INDIAN GUIDE, reviewed on this
site by Silman; however, Ward not only cites
that book but worked with Emms on the opening!
Comparisons aside, it's so hard to find anything
effective (or even interesting!) versus the
Nimzo-Indian these days that players of White
might have a good time using the ideas in this
book. To his credit, Ward doesn't pretend that
his system produces any advantage versus strong
play, but he does make the case for a dynamic
imbalance with equal chances. As always, he
writes with clarity and humor even in this
rather densely packed work. And although in
many cases nothing very clear emerges from
the complications, Ward's chapter summaries
at least point to the most important games
and ideas. This book is recommended for intermediate
through advanced players, and is most useful
as a theoretical work and not a teaching guide. |