Alexander
Khalifman was the last FIDE World Champion before
Anand, and is a first-class grandmaster of enormous
talent. Here he has a new idea for a book: to
present Kramnik's White repertoire while filling
in the many gaps for subvariations that Kramnik
hasn't faced. This task is done in considerable
detail, but also with more than adequate explanation
for the average player. Such depth is possible
because the book is split up into 3 volumes, and
thus will presumably extend to somewhere between
600 and 800 pages by the time it's done.
When explicit guidance (in words)
is lacking, I am particularly impressed with Khalifman's
choice of examples, always strictly relevant to
the issue at hand. This is very often not the
case for other opening books, whose authors tend
to throw in cute but misleading games.
Khalifman's effort also illustrates
the distinct practical advantages of a repertoire
book. The good author can concentrate upon the
theory of the recommended solutions and needn't
fill in the theory of inferior moves for his own
side. The King's Indian Defence dominates this
first volume, with Kramnik's latter-day mainstay
9.b4 in the main line. What I enjoyed most and
learned most from was Khalifman's coverage of
the 'sidelines' to the KID such as 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2
Bg4, or here 6...e5 7.0-0 Na6. With his guidance,
one can cut through all the confusing theory associated
with such lines and find an effective way to play
the White side.
I don't, however, understand Khalifman's
decision to use 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5
Nxd5 5.Qa4+ and 5.e4 Nxc3 6.dxc3 versus the Grunfeld.
I can only find 6 Kramnik games with the first
(harmless) option and not a single one with the
second! Instead, Kramnik almost exclusively plays
for the position after 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.d4
in this line. Or, about half the time, he has
played 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 etc. In
both cases we see him playing the introductory
position of a main-line Gruenfeld. In that position,
Kramnik has played and developed the theory on
7.Bb5+ (in about 18 games), played absolutely
key games with 7.Nf3 and 8.Rb1 (39 times), and
has often played 7.Bc4 over the years. In this
case, then, Khalifman seems to be trying to save
space rather than follow Kramnik. On the other
hand, neither of Khalifman's repertoire solutions
require much memorization and thus have practical
advantages.
My only other and truly minor complaint
is the poor translation. However, this is almost
always the case when someone whose native language
is X tries to translate into language Y. The other
way around is usually preferable, but it can also
be expensive or difficult to arrange.
I have used and am very pleased
with this book, and I look forward to the other
volumes in this series. Club and tournament players
of just about any strength will benefit by studying
this book and adopting at least some of its variations
in their play.
|