Steffen Pedersen has, once again, demonstrated that he is
one of the few chess authors who can balance
analytical coverage and strategic explanation
in a repertoire book and do some sense of justice
to both. Pedersen has the advantage of experience
in this genre – his THE DUTCH FOR THE ATTACKING
PLAYER is one of the better repertoire books
on the market, and he has also produced good
efforts (in two parts with Graham Burgess)
on a white 1.d4 repertoire and a credible book
on the Scheveningen Sicilian.
This book benefits from the subject matter. As Pedersen
notes, the Bb5 Sicilians (which arise after
either 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 or 2...d6 3.Bb5+)
are more strategic in nature than the open
Sicilian with 3.d4. As a result, it is often
easier to explain the plans that both sides
will employ, and the tactics that may be found
in long theoretical sequences are kept within
reason.
This, of course, is an important consideration that should
be valued by the average player. I've long
counseled 1.e4 players with limited study time
to specialize in variations of the Sicilian
that take the choice of variation away from
the black player. This gives white plenty of
options, from the Alapin (2.c3) to the Closed
Variation (2.Nc3) to the Grand Prix (2.Nc3
and 3.f4 or 2.f4) and others (such as 2.b3,
2.d3, 2.g3, etc.). Still, of all these (with
the exception of 2.c3), the lines with Bb5
are perhaps the most popular in games among
high rated players. This would suggest that
they provide realistic opportunities for white
to secure an advantage; the fact that enterprising
players such as Kasparov, Fischer, and Morozovich
have been willing to give them a go as white
is enough support of their viability for me.
It should be noted that Pedersen does not approach this
subject matter as a "white to play and
win" exercise. Indeed, his book
develops a playable repertoire for both white
and black. I think this is the best approach.
From the marketing standpoint, it certainly
makes the book appealing to a wider audience.
Beyond this, I think it helps to build some
balance into the expectations of the reader.
Too many repertoire books come across as the proverbial
snake oil salesman peddling a magic elixir – the
message becomes "spend a few hours with
me, and all your problems will be solved." Of
course, chess (and opening theory) is not nearly
so simple and easy. By providing viable
approaches for both sides, this book argues
for reasonable expectations.
As one who has played both sides of these lines, I was quite
happy with the theoretical discussion. Pedersen
definitely updates the coverage in older works,
such as Razuvayev and Matsukevitch's 1984 book.
He also expands (and provides better explanation
of the nuance of the variations) on the lines
covered in two popular black repertoire works,
Gallagher's BEATING THE ANTI-SICILIANS and
Silman's WINNING WITH THE SICILIAN DEFENSE.
Indeed, my perusal of those books and this
one suggests that the earlier works are no
longer sufficient to entirely cover the Bb5
variations. Time marches on.
In the end, however, a book like this doesn't rise or fall
on its theoretical coverage. By its very
title, we know this isn't a work for grandmasters.
Pedersen succeeds because he explains why certain
move orders are better than others and why
and how general plans have developed and evolved
in the key lines. This is the strength of this
book, and it is why I can recommend it.
No book is perfect. While Pedersen does a great job with
general explanation and guidance on key lines,
a lot of sidelines consist of nothing more
than game fragments. The average player
needs guidance in these fragments as well,
and this is often lacking. More troublesome
to me is what I found to be a very light print
job. Maybe I'm just getting old, but I think
the publisher needs a bit more print on its
presses.
In conclusion, this is a good book about an
important variation for both white and black
Sicilian players. It's written for the practical
player, and I would recommend it – this is
an author who understands what the average
player needs in a repertoire book.
Click to see Silman's review of this
book.