Some
authors have an ability to connect with their
audience, and in this book Neil McDonald focuses
his attention on strategic elements interspersed
with just enough hard theory (and tactics!) to
provide a sufficient overview of an often amorphous
opening.
The English arises after 1.c4 and, in most databases,
trails only 1.d4 and 1.e4 in frequency of play.
Flexibility is its hallmark – while often
staying true to form as a flank opening that
eschews the advance of other center pawns, it
also affords white many opportunities to transpose
into 1.d4 openings. This allows the white player
options on using 1.c4 to avoid certain 1.d4 set-ups
while allowing others.
At the same time, white’s slower development
allows black the choice of many counter set-ups.
The author does a nice job of dealing with each
of these in turn, and the reader seldom feels
overwhelmed by these multiple choices.
McDonald, as with other authors, uses similar
pawn formations (rather than strict move orders)
as a method for grouping material within chapters.
As an example, in the discussion of the Symmetrical
Variation after 1.c4 c5 the author puts in one
chapter all lines that lead to early action in
the center (such as after 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 cxd4
4.Nxd4 as well as 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5). He also
groups all the lines where both sides pursue
a kingside fianchetto. Finally, he concludes
his coverage of the Symmetrical with those lines
where black essays a hedgehog formation.
I generally found this a useful way to approach
the material, and this is the method used throughout
the book. For example, in the Four Knights (1.c4
e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nc6), the normal course would
be to split the material based on white’s
next move. However, the author breaks it down
by whether or not black subsequently plays …d5.
While this means that coverage for white variations
are split among different chapters, this pawn
advance tends to define the sorts of positions
that arise.
McDonald packs this book with explanation of
key plans for both sides. In a strategic opening,
that is very important. I’ve played 1.c4
for over 25 years, and the author made several
telling points that expanded my understanding – not
only of this opening but also of chess in general.
In that respect, this reminds me of efforts by
John Watson – this isn’t simply a
book about a chess opening, it is a book about
chess.
As an example, after 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4
cxd4 4.Nxd4 e6 5.Nc3 Nc6 6.a3 Nxd4 7.Qxd4 b6
8.e4 McDonald writes:
“To become a good chess player you have
to learn all the principles of positional play.
Then, having learnt them all thoroughly, you
have to train yourself to be extremely skeptical
about their value during an individual game.
Principles are at best approximations to the
truth – sometimes they can be entirely
wrong. This is just as well for if it were not
the case it wouldn’t be possible to win
a game against a player who knew all the principles
as he could draw on his knowledge to make one
decent move after another. Here, for example,
White plays an entirely natural sixth move, preventing …Bb4,
so what could be more consistent than gaining
space with 8.e4? In fact there was a better plan,
but it depends on a subtle appreciation of the
position. It is no wonder it was discovered by
Victor Korchnoi, one of the most creative chess
minds of all time. He found 8.Qf4!, placing the
queen on an active and safe square before playing
e2-e4. Then 8…Bb7 9.e4 (only now!) 9…d6
10.Bd3 Be7 11.Qg3! 0-0 12.Bh6 Ne8 13.Bd2 Rc8
14.0-0 gave White a slight but pleasant space
advantage in Korchnoi-Sax, Wijk aan Zee 1991.
“We often read in books that ‘gaining
space with e2-e4 is a good idea’ but never
that ‘Qf4 and Qg3 is a good maneuver’ – so
learn to look at the position in front of you.”
The book is full of this sort of insight, and
it helps that the illustrative game format allows
the author to comment on all aspects of the play
that arises from this opening. This is as much
an exposition of middlegame and endgame play
in the English as it is an opening textbook.
In fact, using this solely as an opening text
may lead to trouble. While the English is not
nearly as sharp as some other openings, it has
its crazy moments. I was surprised to see, from
looking at the bibliography, that the author
had not consulted several fairly recent books
on the opening. For example, both David Cummings
and Carsten Hansen have written books on the
Symmetrical English (the former by Everyman Chess,
the latter by Gambit); Hansen has also written
a Gambit book on 1.c4 e5. None of these were
listed in the bibliography.
As an example, in the symmetrical after 1.c4
c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 e6 6.d4
is a sharp line that’s been played by many
top players. After 6…Nxd4 7.Nxd4 cxd4 McDonald
adequately covers the variation after 8.Nb5,
which seems to work out fine for black. However,
the more recent white try, 8.Ne4, is not mentioned.
Both of the previously mentioned books on the
Symmetrical variation cover this line, and John
Watson’s brilliant CHESS STRATEGY IN ACTION
also spends a fair amount of time on the line.
In short, it is a dangerous line that black should
know something about if he wishes to venture
this line in tournament player.
There are a few curious choices as well. In
the Keres Defense, after 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.g3
c6 White’s best (and most popular) move
has generally been considered to be 4.Nf3. Hansen
goes so far as to award it an exclam. McDonald,
however, chooses to spend his example game on
4.d4 and analyze a 1993 team game where Kasparov
simply steamrolls an over-matched opponent.
These are not, however, the norm. In the vast
majority of lines, McDonald has done a pretty
good job of representing mainstream theory in
a balanced way. While white wins about two out
of three of the illustrative games, the author
is quick to point out equalizing methods for
the second player as well as white tries for
an advantage.
In some places, there is some interesting coverage
that updates the earlier referenced work. For
example, after 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4 4.g4!?
is a typically dynamic modern interpretation
of wing pawn play. Other standard English works,
such as Bagirov’s ENGLISH OPENING Classical
and Indian do not cover this aggressive thrust.
The real strength of the book, however, is the
strategic discussion. At its basic level, this
series uses a variety of visual cues to help
the reader pick up on key points. There are symbols
for tips, notes, and warnings. While many in
this book are specific to the English, some are
generalized chess instruction. Generally, they
are helpful and provide a handy list of do’s
and don’ts.
Beyond these, McDonald frequently goes out of
his way to provide deeper discussion of the finer
points of the variations from this opening. The
English can lead to an exceptionally broad array
of structures – everything from slow motion
blocked centers with flank play (the Botvinnik
system), flank play with a fluid center, central
play with a fluid center, and flank play with
no center! Throughout it all, the author approaches
the methods for both players with useful examples,
discussion, and analysis.
An example is his discussion of move orders
related to lines that often arise from a variation
of the Reti (1.Nf3 d5 2.c4). In explaining the
ins and outs, McDonald notes that:
“In contrast to 1.Nf3 Nf6, after 1.c4
c6 2.Nf3 d5 Black hasn’t committed his
knight to f6 immediately. This becomes important
after 1.c4 c6 2.Nf3 d5 3.g3 Bg4 4.Bg2. Black
can play 4…Nd7! cutting out the variation
4…Nf6 5.Ne5 Bh5 6.cxd5 cxd5. Consequently,
I suggest that White should also be crafty with
his move order and open with 1.c4 c6 2.g3! d5
3.Bg2, waiting for Black to commit his knight
to f6.
“Now 3…Bg4 is simply bad after 4.cxd5
cxd5 5.Qb3 hitting b7 and d5, while the risky
3…dxc4 is analyzed below. Therefore Black
has nothing better than 3…Nf6, when 4.Nf3
follows and we are back in familiar territory.”
This is the sort of practical move order commentary
that other authors gloss over, but it will likely
be of great value to the book’s audience.
It’s always nice to know that an author
actually plays the material he writes about,
and there are a couple of illustrative games
featuring McDonald as white. Interestingly, one
of the two was a pretty gory loss, but that’s
probably part of the book’s appeal – if
a strong grandmaster can go down in flames in
the opening he espouses, then we too should have
the courage to persevere when things don’t
go exactly right.
This is a larger book than others in the Starting
Out series, and that is evident in its overall
presentation. At 191 pages, it has about 15 more
pages than its counterparts on the King’s
Indian, Sicilian, French, and Nimzo-Indian, and
about 50 more than on the Ruy Lopez and Queen’s
Gambit. It is also helpful that there is a rudimentary
index of variations, which is found in some but
not all the books in this series.
Everyman Chess puts out solid books with decent
production values. The book’s overall dimensions,
font size, and uses of bold print make it very
user friendly. While I generally prefer a double
column layout (this series uses the single column
approach), the white space on the page seems
acceptable. My one concern is the method for
using diagrams. Because of the one-column format,
on most pages there are two diagrams put side
by side, generally covering an early starting
point in the variation and another from further
along in the game. Unfortunately, often that
second diagram comes at a point so far along
that it is on another page. It is very distracting
to have to flip back and forth between pages
to consider a diagrammed position – in
many instances, the value of the diagram is entirely
lost.
In conclusion, STARTING OUT: THE ENGLISH is
another good blend of a basic look at the theory
of an important opening with an explanation of
the key ideas and themes for both sides. While
some lines may require consulting other recent
works to be totally in sync with modern theory,
most players will benefit from the author’s
insight and analysis.
Click to see Donaldson's review
of this book.
YOU
CAN FIND THIS BOOK AT

|