Page
1 | Page 2
Chances are, you have something better to do
than to study openings all day (or at least something
you have to do, like work). Many players deal
with this time shortage in the wrong way. They
employ an array of trick openings that blow up
in their face if the opponent is on the ball,
or they play anti-positional junk just to get
the game out of theory. Good news for you people:
You can play sound, principled chess without
learning 25 moves of theory. Follow my “Opening
Shortcuts” and you will develop weapons of chess
destruction.
The Black (or Two) Knights Tango is a Queen
Pawn Defense that borders on mainstream acceptance.
It often leads to mainstream Nimzo-Indian or
Bogo-Indian positions (hey, it’s a shortcut,
it’s not a free lunch), but also trips up unsuspecting
victims. The first few moves are: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 Nc6!?

WHAT, NO PAWN MOVES?
I certainly didn’t invent this stuff, and I
saw Yermolinsky and Orlov trot it out before
me (now you can steal from me as I stole from
them). But I have had very good results, and
have realized a few things along the way:
1) Opponents under 2200 tend to be a bit confused.
They aren’t programmed to meet this move; they
can’t pull something out of their repertoire.
[Though if they are reading this stuff too, they
will be more ready next time] Opponents who favor
playing into the Nimzo-Indian are likely to respond 3.Nc3.
Though this is a perfectly good move (Karpov
played it once), I do not believe it is the best
one. Black is able to hit in the center straight
off with 3…e5. After 3.d5 (3.Nf3
exd4 4.Nxd4 Bb4 is a position from the English,
but if the guy wanted to play the English, he
would have opened with 1.c4) 3…Ne7 4.e4 (the cunning 4.h4 can be met by the surprising 4…Neg8!?;
the knight will return to e7 after the bishop
is developed) 4…Ng6 the knight has been conveniently
redeployed, with the bishop set to follow on
the next move to c5 or b4. White cannot prevent
both of these moves. If Black should swap his
dark-square bishop (highly likely), he will have
a dark square pawn structure with light squared
bishops on the board. White will have a light
square pawn structure with a light squared bishop.
If you haven’t taken Pawn Structure 101 at Positional
U., this is GOOD FOR BLACK. [Now read one of
Jeremy’s books] Black also has an eventual break with …f7-f5,
while White may not have the same counterplay
on the other side. Here is a practical example:
Stephen
Brudno-Joel Benjamin [A50]
U.S.
Open Framingham, 2001
1.d4
Nf6 2.c4 Nc6 3.Nc3 e5 4.d5 Ne7 5.e4 Ng6 6.Be3
Bb4 7.f3 Bxc3+
This is important: DO NOT hang your bishop with
7…d6 8.Qa4+.
8.bxc3
d6 9.c5
This undoubles White’s pawns before Black can
fix them, but now Black actually gets play on
that side, too.
9…0-0 10.Bd3 Nd7 11.cxd6 cxd6 12.Ne2
Qa5 13.0-0 Nc5 14.Bc4 Bd7 15.Bb3 Rac8 16.g3
f5 17.Bc2 fxe4 18.fxe4 Rxf1+ 19.Kxf1 Bh3+ 20.Kg1
Rf8 21.Qd2

BLACK TO MOVE AND WIN
21…Qxa2!
I confess, I had seen this before. But it’s
still a good one.
22.Re1
Qc4 23.Bf2 a5 24.Nc1 Rf3 25.Ne2 a4 26.Qg5 Nxe4,
0-1.
While White’s play was not particularly strong,
it was plausible. In fact, the position after
move 21 is identical to Spiller-Orlov, Los Angeles 1991 (A few extra moves were
played in my game). The finish there was a bit
more aesthetic – 22.Rb1 Qxb1+ (actually move
nineteen) 0-1.
But even a stronger player can be unnerved by
the Tango. Witness how a Women’s World Champion
is brutally assaulted by Larry Christiansen:
Zhu Chen
(2535) – Larry Christiansen (2565) [A50]
US-China
Summit, Seattle USA, 2001
1.d4
Nf6 2.c4 Nc6 3.Nc3 e5 4.d5 Ne7 5.g3
“Hey Joel, isn’t my knight on g6 stupid now?
You call that ‘conveniently redeployed’?” Relax,
it’s not the end of the world. Read on.
5…Ng6
6.Bg2 Bc5 7.e3
Now Zhu Chen shuts down another piece. Is Larry
getting positionally refuted? [Not that he would
care; he would checkmate her anyway, somehow]
No – the White position isn’t active enough to
really trouble Black. Note that the c1-bishop,
an important piece in this structure, now has
nothing to do.
7…0-0
8.Nge2 a6
Not only preserving his bishop, but preparing
active play on the queenside. Zhu Chen reacts
too optimistically.
9.0-0
d6 10.Bd2
Perhaps 10.a3, 11.b4 and 12.Bb2 would be a better
plan.
10…Bd7 11.Rb1 b5 12.b4 Bb6 13.a4 bxc4 14.a5 Ba7 15.b5 axb5 16.Nxb5
Bf5 17.Ra1 Bc5 18.Nec3 Bd3 19.e4

WHAT WOULD LARRY DO?
19…Qd7!
If Black grabbed the exchange, White would get
back a pawn and have fair compensation.
20.Re1 Rfb8 21.Qa4 Ng4 22.Be3 Nxe3 23.fxe3 h5!
Larry sure has a flair for attacking. He should
write a book about it, or something.
24.Bf1 h4 25.Bxd3 cxd3 26.Kg2 hxg3 27.hxg3 d2 28.Re2 Qg4 29.Rh1
Nf4+!
This very pretty sacrifice collapses White’s
position.
30.exf4
exf4 31.Rxd2 Qxg3+ 32.Kf1 Qf3+ 33.Ke1 Qxh1+,
0-1.
Page 1 | Page 2 |