I must have some latent masochistic streak to subject myself to yet another
LADY SNOWBLOOD film. While I did reluctantly recommend the first installment,
it left me nauseous and depressed. This one just left me peeved. From the DVD
case:
"1905. The end of the Russo-Japanese war
that has created a new self confidence in
Japan, and underpinned the power of the militarists
and right extremists.
"Yuki (Lady Snowblood) has been found guilty
of multiple murder and sentenced to hang.
Set free by Kikui, the ruthless head of the
secret police, she is recruited into his
service as a political infiltrator. His target
is Ransui Tokunaga, a key figure in the anarchist
movement that threatens the establishment
and the Emperor.
"Tokunaga possesses a document that could
blow away the forces of reaction and the
government, in the form of a letter that
reveals their involvement in framing and
executing a number of innocent people in
order to further their own political ends.
"Before this affair is concluded, which
mixes personal tragedy with public tyranny,
Lady Snowblood will have again set herself
firmly on the side of the outlaws, the dispossessed
and the oppressed, as her sword paints a
bespattered trail of carnage that leads to
the very heart of corruption."
Whoever wrote this could sell you anything.
With a description like that, you can see
why I was duped into watching this miserable
sequel.
The movie starts with a betrayal that had
me screaming at the TV, " Lady Snowblood,
have you learned nothing?! Trust no one!" As
if this character flaw wasn't enough, she
is then surrounded by hordes of law enforcement.
Now, if you read my first Snowblood review,
you know this poor lady has led a pretty
dismal life. When faced with a lose-lose
situation, you'd figure she'd be lookin' for
an excuse to die - either hari kari or a
blaze of glory. So what does Lady Snowblood
do? She throws away her sword and says, "Come
and get me." No fight, no blood, no nothin'.
How can I get behind a heroine like that?
Quentin Tarantino speaks very highly of
Meiko, but to me there's a difference between
being stoic and understated - and being just
a . blank . void. Anyone home? It's not Meiko's
fault, though. You'd draw a blank, too, if
you were caught in such an absurd plot. Ironic
that there's a lot more character exploration
in the sequel, but none of it has to do with
Lady Snowblood!
I never thought I'd say this, but what this
movie really needs is more mindless violence -there's
hardly any of it - to make up for the dumb
ass plot.
I will give Lady Snowblood this: she's one
tough lady, surviving multiple gunshot wounds
in the sequel. But would someone please explain
to me how she survived the skewering at the
end of the first film? I wish she hadn't.
Click to see Teri's review of the first
Lady Snowblood film.